Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Coding.net vs Codeberg, the Slant community recommends Codeberg for most people. In the question“What are the best Git web interfaces?” Codeberg is ranked 6th while Coding.net is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose Codeberg is:
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Coding Pages
Host your pages directly from a Coding repository.
Pro Coding.net offers unlimited private repositories for free
Pro WebIDE
Coding WebIDE is a cloud-based IDE developed by Coding Team.You can create your own workspace and develop projects here.WebIDE works fine with Git. You can use Coding, GitHub, BitBucket, Git@OSC as your Git repository. Workspaces are powered by Docker Ubuntu containers. The development environment can be saved and shared to your team member.
Pro Open source
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Pro Intuitive user interface
Easy to mess around and feels very natural in general.
Pro Managed by a non-profit organization
Codeberg is community driven and managed by a non-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany. The servers are also managed by them. In conclusion, your privacy and source code is protected!
Pro Lightweight
Codeberg uses Gitea as its Git software so it's extremely lightweight. Especially compared to Gitlab or Github.
Cons
Con This is not FOSS, and it doesn't have a self-hosted solution
Con Unreadable
The website is in Chinese, you need to use Chrome browser to be able to read it !
