Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Alfred Clipboard /Snippet viewer vs CopyQ, the Slant community recommends Alfred Clipboard /Snippet viewer for most people. In the question“What are the best clipboard managers for Mac?” Alfred Clipboard /Snippet viewer is ranked 3rd while CopyQ is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Alfred Clipboard /Snippet viewer is:
Amazing all in one program.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro All in one
Amazing all in one program.
Pro Nice merge clips feature
The merge clips feature is pretty sweet.
Pro Terminal/Shell
Quickly open the terminal and run shell commands.
Pro Also supports snippets
Boosts productivity by using snippets to save your frequently used text clips.
Pro Themes
In the Appearance preferences, you can change the look of Alfred's window, as well as choose how you want your search results to be presented.
Pro Dictionary
Look up words in Alfred or macOS's dictionary, and paste them into another app.
Pro Simple to setup
Pro Easy to use
Pro Free
Pro Add notes or tags to items
Most effective with stacks that don't automatically delete the oldest members, tags and notes allow you to use CopyQ as a personal database for important information with easy access and retrieval.
Pro Cross-platform and cross-DE
CopyQ supports all major Linux desktop environments (including KDE Plasma, GNOME, Xfce, etc.), Windows and MacOS X 10.9+.
Pro Can sort and store based on content type
Built-in support for text, HTML, images or any other custom formats, allowing for type-based clip stacks that each have their own custom actions (open images in a photo editor, open URLs in a browser, etc.)
Pro Browse and filter items in history
Quickly locate that snippet you copied months ago but don't recall precisely what it was.
Cons
Con Only simple text - no support for rich text data
Con No way to edit clips
Once a clip is stored you cannot edit it at all, one can delete it and create a new one but no direct way of editing.
Con Clipboard History is limited to 3 months
Con Bad UI
Does not match the MacOS UI theme.
Con impossible to quit/start copyq via script
Con In linux, it sometimes does not react to shortcuts
Also buggy when hiding.
Con Sometimes copies filtered entries in between selection
Con Can't export images in bulk
Con Slow with many entries
Con Slow to place selected content on editor
Takes a while to place the selected text into the editor.
