Here’s the Deal

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem vs Sollar PuTTY

57 17

24 19

When comparing SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem vs Sollar PuTTY, the Slant community recommends SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for Windows?” SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem is ranked 5th while Sollar PuTTY is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem is:

All you have to do is go to the Microsoft store, choose a Linux distro you like, and install the client for free.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best SSH clients for Windows?

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem

Sollar PuTTY

Pros

Pro
It's extremely easy to get running

All you have to do is go to the Microsoft store, choose a Linux distro you like, and install the client for free.

Pro
Based on OpenSSH

OpenSSH is the reference for all ssh clients.

Pro
Excellent way for Windows users to learn Linux

It is much easier and more convenient than dealing with a dual boot Linux installation.

Pro
Full Linux shell

Uses all relevant Linux ssh commands as normal.

Pro
Color coded host

Host connections can be assigned a color, so you quickly discern them in the host list and in the connection tabs.

Pro
Allows storage of login credentials

Sollar Putty creates an encrypted local file where you can store the login details for your devices.

Pro
Provides significant expansion of PuTTY capabilities for free

In additional to regular PuTTY features you get multi-tab interface, auto-login, quick access to recent sessions, integration of Windows Search, and other useful features.

Ad
Cons

Con
Graphical problems

For example running Midnight commander (MC) makes terminal blinking.

Con
Crontab and other background jobs don't work properly

Crontab only runs on ROOT, and it needs Windows to stay open. If you close it, you will kill the crontab. Some background jobs don't run on Windows WSL.

Con
Command line editing does not work properly

Overrides chars instead of inserting them... depending on position and moon phase?

Con
Does not install on PC virtual machines

Con
Forces window to a certain size

Any other SSH client will render the remote server at whatever size the local client window is. The built-in SSH client on Windows, however, forces you to use a standard size, and it's small enough to cause problems.

Con
Windows' SSH key agent service is broken

Attempting to use the built-in ssh-agent provided with Windows will cause errors and authentication failures due to an incompatibility between Windows' ssh-agent and OpenSSH on remote systems.

Con
Cut & paste works like the Windows prompt

Older versions of the Windows Command Prompt select text in a rectangular region of the console, rather than starting at a character position and selecting forward or backward along with the logical flow of text. To copy a sentence, for example, would require that you select all content in the two lines that contain the sentence, then trim what isn't needed, rather than just selecting the sentence. In later versions of Windows 10, this may not be an issue, as the cut-and-paste behavior has changed.