When comparing Blisk browser vs Ghost Browser, the Slant community recommends Blisk browser for most people. In the question“What are the best web browsers for Windows?” Blisk browser is ranked 38th while Ghost Browser is ranked 42nd. The most important reason people chose Blisk browser is:
Blisk offers a lot of different devices: phones, tablets, laptops, desktops. support touch event, landscape or portrait mode, have a proper screen resolution, device pixel ratio and user agent. The list of devices updates constantly.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Device emulation
Blisk offers a lot of different devices: phones, tablets, laptops, desktops. support touch event, landscape or portrait mode, have a proper screen resolution, device pixel ratio and user agent. The list of devices updates constantly.
Pro A browser made for development
Pro Auto-refresh pages
Every time you save code changes - Blisk refreshes tab(s). Blisk updates CSS changes even without page refresh.
Pro URL and Scroll Sync
Blisk synchronizes URL and scroll position for both mobile and desktop. Mobile and desktop follow each other by URL and scroll position. Blisk does the routine work for you. It always shows the same page and same portion of the content on desktop and mobile.
Pro Error notifier
Blisk monitors page errors in JavaScript and resources that failed to load. Blisk notifies you when the issue appears and searches for the solution on StackOverflow.
Pro Multiple DevTools
Blisk delivers best DevTools (same as in Chrome). You can launch separate DevTools for desktop and mobile and use them simultaneously to inspect elements, measure performance etc.
Pro Take a screenshots and records video
Blisk can take a screenshot/record video and store them in Blisk cloud
Pro Log into any website with multiple accounts in one window
Pro Projects function removes the need to log in
With the new release (as of Dec 6th 2016), you can save a group of "Sessions" with logins stored to a Project, which you can launch with the click of a button. "Projects" eliminates the need to spend time setting up your workflow every day, so you can get right to work.
Pro Save a set of isolated cookie jars into a project
Pro Color coding for session organization
Different sessions are distinguishable by color for easier organization. You can also rename sessions to fit your needs.
Pro Group your cookie jars
Pro Developer tools for each session
The developer tools work just like Chrome, except that you can separate dev tools by session.
Pro Assign a different proxy to each tab for international sites
Cons
Con There is no ability to screenshot scrolling full webpage.
I hope I'm missing where the function is located because otherwise this browser is a great tool.
Con No Linux support
Although it has been announced since 2 years nothing happened.
Con Some useful features are only for the premium accounts
Cloud storage, taking screenshots, auto-refresh, screen recorder are all features that are only available if you get the premium version which costs $9.99/per month or $8.49/annually.
Con No essential tools for web development
Con Doesn't support linux
Supports only windows and mac
Con Closed source
Proprietary software makes it harder to port, study, and do further edge-case testing without breaking terms and possibly getting sued. It even makes it harder to test on multiple OS platforms, some with varying ability for rendering.