When comparing d3fc vs Chart.js, the Slant community recommends Chart.js for most people. In the question“What are the best open source JavaScript charting libraries?” Chart.js is ranked 2nd while d3fc is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Chart.js is:
The library contains a set of 6 charts and is 11Kb gzipped, this makes its loading time and page impact low.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Built using D3v4
d3fc is built using the latest D3v4, and has the same modular architecture. It is currently made up of 17 sub-projects.
Pro Complements and extends D3
d3fc provides a number of higher-order D3 components that make it easier to build charts. With d3fc you can create series, annotations, samplers and layouts using the familiar D3 data-join pattern.
Pro Lightweight and fast
The library contains a set of 6 charts and is 11Kb gzipped, this makes its loading time and page impact low.
Pro Responsive charts
The charts are fully responsive, meaning they resize based on the viewport width.
Pro Clear documentation
The chart.js documentation is well organized and provides detailed information on using each feature.
Pro Plugin support
Many plugins available via NPM and you can easily write your own
Cons
Con Limited features
Chart.js currently offers only 6 graph types, and lacks the flexibility offered by other options. For example, controlling the display of tooltips is fairly limited.
Con Canvas based
Canvas it bitmap based and shares the same issues as non-vector formats.