Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing hyper vs Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client, the Slant community recommends Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for Windows?” Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client is ranked 14th while hyper is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client is:
Since this tool is cloud-based, there's no need to download and install anything. You can simpy run it from the browser.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Cross-platform due to electron browser-based foundation
Although not Windows-friendly. But nobody uses Windows terminal anyway.
Pro Built on electron, supports split panels and plugins
Pro SSH & SFTP in your browser
Since this tool is cloud-based, there's no need to download and install anything. You can simpy run it from the browser.
Pro RDP/VNC Support
Pro Always up to date
Pro Your devices are available on any device
Pro Tunnel support
Pro RDP/VNC In your browser
Remote desktop your servers from the browser.
Pro Telnet Support
Cons
Con Made with Electron
It uses a considerable amount of resources, compared to other offerings.
Con Not as cross platform as advertised
Most features only work on Mac OS.
Con Incorrect rendering
Terminal window has visual artifacts.
Con No configuration UI; all options must be set via JSON
Con Still maturing as of December 2016
Folks noticed some issues in the 1.0 release cited here.
Con Difficult to find information about it, because of the confusion with hyperterminal
Con Expensive
$3.90 per month
Con Not free
In fact not only not free, but only available at a subscription basis.
Con Sluggish output
It's ok for a quick session, but compared to native apps it's output is slow.
Con Lack of configurability
Not enough options to trim it to your needs.
Con Can't access LAN servers
