When comparing Spine vs Creature, the Slant community recommends Spine for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D animation tools for game development?” Spine is ranked 1st while Creature is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Spine is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Integration libraries support most engines
Pro Simplified UI allows for an easy learning curve
No-nonsense workflow allows you to create your artwork in programs much better suited for the task like Illustrator and Inkscape for example, while Spine itself focuses only on the important task of skeletal animation.
Pro Allows for easy use of artwork from third party programs
Spine's developers provide scripts which makes exporting artwork from third party programs much easier to do.
Pro Community-driven feature roadmap
Esoteric Software maintains public Trello boards to help plan and prioritize feature additions.
Pro Funded via Kickstarter
Spine received resounding support from Kickstarter backers, beating its pledge goal by over 5 times.
Pro Automated animation
One of Creature's strengths is its ability to assign motors on bones which will generate animations based on parameters set on the motors.
Pro Unity runtime always up to date
Among various game engine supported, Unity is the most up to date runtime including the most recent features, many samples, integrating well in the Unity editor.
Pro Easy to use
Creature has a simple workflow structured into 3 steps: Meshing, Rig and Animate.
Con Professional Edition is expensive
Essential edition includes nearly all features, but IK Weights and Mesh Animations are not included in the Essential Edition.
Con No integration for some major engines
Spine does not directly support several popular 2D engines, including Construct 2, Clickteam Fusion, and GameMaker Studio. Unreal Engine and CryEngine also have no native modules.