When comparing Spine vs Piskel, the Slant community recommends Spine for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D animation tools for game development?” Spine is ranked 3rd while Piskel is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Spine is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Integration libraries support most engines
Pro Simplified UI allows for an easy learning curve
No-nonsense workflow allows you to create your artwork in programs much better suited for the task like Illustrator and Inkscape for example, while Spine itself focuses only on the important task of skeletal animation.
Pro Allows for easy use of artwork from third party programs
Spine's developers provide scripts which makes exporting artwork from third party programs much easier to do.
Pro Community-driven feature roadmap
Esoteric Software maintains public Trello boards to help plan and prioritize feature additions.
Pro Funded via Kickstarter
Spine received resounding support from Kickstarter backers, beating its pledge goal by over 5 times.
Pro Works in any browser
WPiskel is HTML5-based so it works in any modern browser.
Pro Offline versions available
The downloadable version of Piskel (built with node-webkit) is available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X.
Pro Open source
Piskel is licensed under Apache License, meaning that the user can use the software for any purpose.
Pro Animation support
Piskel includes onion skinning, exporting to sprite sheets or gifs, defining frame rate, and present live playback.
Pro Easy to use Lighten and darken tool
with the click of a button create amazing shading
Pro Very simple for beginners
Once you get the hang of it its a very powerful tool
Pro enough tools to be powerful
but not too many to put off beginners
Pro sleek interface
which is also easy on the eyes
Con Professional Edition is expensive
Essential edition includes nearly all features, but IK Weights and Mesh Animations are not included in the Essential Edition.
Con No integration for some major engines
Spine does not directly support several popular 2D engines, including Construct 2, Clickteam Fusion, and GameMaker Studio. Unreal Engine and CryEngine also have no native modules.
Con Lacks a true resizing tool
There doesn't seem to be any decent tool in Piskel for an easy stretch or shrink. The only ways possible is resizing the whole image or importing and image and shrinking it from the export tool.
Con Rotation is limited
Rotation is only made in predefined angles. Does not support variable rotations or mouse based rotation. Does not support rotating selected areas, only frames-layers.
Con hand by hand shading
shading can be difficult