Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariToad vs Schemaball
When comparing Toad vs Schemaball, the Slant community recommends Schemaball for most people. In the question“What are the best relational database design and modelling tools?” Schemaball is ranked 13th while Toad is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Schemaball is:
Schemaball can read schemas from multiple sources such as SQL schema dumps, flat files or live databases.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Reliable
Toad is maintained by Dell and has great community support.
Pro Free
Toad is free to use.
Pro Supports reading schemas from multiple sources
Schemaball can read schemas from multiple sources such as SQL schema dumps, flat files or live databases.
Pro Interesting twist on visual interface
Gives a quick way to grasp an overview on the past/present complexity of the database (or group of tables) undergoing inspection.
Cons
Con Fewer features
Still some more features are required to add. Other than that its perfectly fine.
Con No built-in SSH tunneling
Toad currently doesn't provide built-in SSH tunneling.
Con Visualizations may be hard to get used to
Since schemas are visualized by using stylized "schema balls" it may be hard getting used to them since they are so different from the other, more straightforward options.
