When comparing Mail.app vs MailMate, the Slant community recommends MailMate for most people. In the question“What are the best e-mail clients for macOS?” MailMate is ranked 1st while Mail.app is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose MailMate is:
While most email clients support searching content from their To, From and Cc fields, MailMate lets users search down to the different sections of these fields. For example, you can search for the address only, or the name only, or even any one of the embedded headers. Subjects can be searched by prefixes, or by specific words which may be contained within and so on.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Integration (with other Apps/Hardware)
One thing Apple does well is to integrate its apps and hardware. The mail app is no exception. If you must be in the hermit kingdom, at least take advantage of the (often excellent) features provided.
Pro Will probably be enough for a sizable chunk of users
Since it's the built-in Mac email client and is quite complete feature-wise, most users will not really need any other third-party applications out there. Mail.app should be enough for their needs.
Pro Easily annotate pictures or sign documents inside the client itself
Mail.app has powerful markup tools which let users add annotations to images or even sign documents they got through email without ever leaving the client.
Pro Smart folders on steroids
- You can choose out of tenths of mailheaders (several hundreds including virtual headers)
- "<header> is (not) in <folder> <header>" operator which enables you to do cool filters
- Each smart folder can have smart subfolders by an user definable key
Pro Shows threaded view with snippets in middle panel
Pro Can be easily extended
If the basic features inside Mail.app are not enough, it can easily be extended through plugins to add new features.
Pro Extremely powerful search features
While most email clients support searching content from their To, From and Cc fields, MailMate lets users search down to the different sections of these fields. For example, you can search for the address only, or the name only, or even any one of the embedded headers. Subjects can be searched by prefixes, or by specific words which may be contained within and so on.
Pro Keyboard focused
MailMate is extremely keyboard-focused. Almost every action can be configured to be achieved through a key combination in the settings. With the help of the keyboard shortcuts you can easily navigate through thousands of messages to find the one you need.
Pro Markdown support
Markdown is a way to format text quickly using only the keyboard. Different text characters create different text: for example, putting asterisks (*) around a word or group of words will italicize them, while double asterisks (**) will bold that text. Markdown is a basic formatting system that can then be adapted to HTML or other formats.
Pro Clean, no-fuss interface
MailMate's UI is very basic. The icons are limited to some default MacOS standard folder images and the interface is very clean and simple, showing only what's needed without any fuss or distracting colours. Instead, opting for a mostly grey interface, with a sprinkle of some other colours here and there.
Pro Smart folders on steroids
- you can choose out of tenths of mailheaders (several hundreds including virtual headers)
- "<header> is (not) in <folder> <header>" operator which enables you to do cool filters
- each smart folder can have smart subfolders by an user definable key
Pro Reliable
Both MailMate's speed and performance are highly reliable.
Pro Great documentation
The official documentation for MailMate is very thorough and helpful. It covers all options and features in a clear and efficient manner.
Pro Columns (which have gone missing in Apple Mail in Catalina)
Pro Faster
Faster the Mail.app specially if you have many emails
Pro Nice tagging support
One can define tupels of IMAP keywords and tags (which are shown in UI). In case of Gmail one can define triples of IMAP Keywords, Tags, and gmail lables.
(in Thunderbird one can only define the tags, whereas the corresponding IMAP keyword is not user-definable.)
Pro The only mail app compatible with BusyContact in Catalina
Cons
Con No option to snooze emails
You can not snooze emails to view later. This makes it hard to keep the inbox clean at all times since you have to read every email and choose to delete or keep them the moment they arrive to do so.
Con Missing lots of advanced features
Out of the box, Mail.app may not have as many features as some other options. This can be mitigated with plugins though. But that is not a perfect solution since third-party plugins may not be very reliable in the long run.
Con Really bad reliability
Database engine gets stuck consuming 100% of one core; crashes; a 40GB log file has been spotted.
Con Updates may break plugins
Apple is known to make API changes to Mail.app when updating which break a lot of plugins.
This can be very annoying for users whose workflow heavily relies on plugins, since they have to wait for plugin developers to make the changes needed to fix any issues brought by the update.
Con Poor performance for some users on El Capitan
Con Ugly
Con Poor calendar integration in exchange mode
Con Hard to master
For occasional users who only write emails to friends and loved ones, MailMate's features may be a bit of an overkill since it's designed for power users who spend a lot of time writing and reading/organizing emails.
Con Not so "native" Gmail support
Because it's more IMAP native, and Gmail uses some non-native IMAP stuff (according to MailMate's documentation).
Con Ugly!
Seriously dated UI and looks too much like Apple Mail
Con No POP or Exchange support
MailMate supports IMAP and IMAP only, there's no POP or Exchange support.
Con A little steep price
$50