Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Mail.app vs Mailplane 3, the Slant community recommends Mail.app for most people. In the question“What are the best e-mail clients for macOS?” Mail.app is ranked 5th while Mailplane 3 is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Mail.app is:
One thing Apple does well is to integrate its apps and hardware. The mail app is no exception. If you must be in the hermit kingdom, at least take advantage of the (often excellent) features provided.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Integration (with other Apps/Hardware)
One thing Apple does well is to integrate its apps and hardware. The mail app is no exception. If you must be in the hermit kingdom, at least take advantage of the (often excellent) features provided.
Pro Will probably be enough for a sizable chunk of users
Since it's the built-in Mac email client and is quite complete feature-wise, most users will not really need any other third-party applications out there. Mail.app should be enough for their needs.
Pro Easily annotate pictures or sign documents inside the client itself
Mail.app has powerful markup tools which let users add annotations to images or even sign documents they got through email without ever leaving the client.
Pro Smart folders on steroids
- You can choose out of tenths of mailheaders (several hundreds including virtual headers)
- "<header> is (not) in <folder> <header>" operator which enables you to do cool filters
- Each smart folder can have smart subfolders by an user definable key
Pro Shows threaded view with snippets in middle panel
Pro Can be easily extended
If the basic features inside Mail.app are not enough, it can easily be extended through plugins to add new features.
Pro Can work with mutiple Gmail accounts simultaneously
The tabbed interface included in Mailplane 3 lets users work with as many Gmail accounts simultaneously as they want.
Pro Fast and light
Pro Doubles as a calendar
Mailplane 3 combines Google Calendar and Gmail within a single app.
Pro Easy to use
Mailplane 3 looks just like Gmail's web UI and even imports Gmail shortcuts. If Gmail shortcuts aren't ideal for the user, those of Mac can be used instead.
Pro Supports many plugins
Functionality and features can be extended by using plugins.
Cons
Con No option to snooze emails
You can not snooze emails to view later. This makes it hard to keep the inbox clean at all times since you have to read every email and choose to delete or keep them the moment they arrive to do so.
Con Missing lots of advanced features
Out of the box, Mail.app may not have as many features as some other options. This can be mitigated with plugins though. But that is not a perfect solution since third-party plugins may not be very reliable in the long run.
Con Really bad reliability
Database engine gets stuck consuming 100% of one core; crashes; a 40GB log file has been spotted.
Con Updates may break plugins
Apple is known to make API changes to Mail.app when updating which break a lot of plugins.
This can be very annoying for users whose workflow heavily relies on plugins, since they have to wait for plugin developers to make the changes needed to fix any issues brought by the update.
Con Poor performance for some users on El Capitan
Con Ugly
Con Poor calendar integration in exchange mode
Con Written for those who drink Google's Kool-Aid
It's a thinly-veiled skin over the browser interface. Why bother?
Con Can freeze very often
Con Gmail only
Mailplane 3 is a Gmail-only client. It does not support other email providers.
