When comparing Mail.app vs eM Client, the Slant community recommends Mail.app for most people. In the question“What are the best e-mail clients for macOS?” Mail.app is ranked 5th while eM Client is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose Mail.app is:
One thing Apple does well is to integrate its apps and hardware. The mail app is no exception. If you must be in the hermit kingdom, at least take advantage of the (often excellent) features provided.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Integration (with other Apps/Hardware)
One thing Apple does well is to integrate its apps and hardware. The mail app is no exception. If you must be in the hermit kingdom, at least take advantage of the (often excellent) features provided.
Pro Will probably be enough for a sizable chunk of users
Since it's the built-in Mac email client and is quite complete feature-wise, most users will not really need any other third-party applications out there. Mail.app should be enough for their needs.
Pro Easily annotate pictures or sign documents inside the client itself
Mail.app has powerful markup tools which let users add annotations to images or even sign documents they got through email without ever leaving the client.
Pro Smart folders on steroids
- You can choose out of tenths of mailheaders (several hundreds including virtual headers)
- "<header> is (not) in <folder> <header>" operator which enables you to do cool filters
- Each smart folder can have smart subfolders by an user definable key
Pro Shows threaded view with snippets in middle panel
Pro Can be easily extended
If the basic features inside Mail.app are not enough, it can easily be extended through plugins to add new features.
Pro Many useful options
Such as sorting through categories, etc.
Pro Free and paid version
It is free for 2 accounts and as long as you don't use it commercially. Paid version comes with support and can handle more than 2 accounts.
Pro Still actively developed
They've been developing and improving it consistently for years.
Pro Calendar inclusive
Pro Beautiful interface, customisable to your needs
Pro It's simple to add new accounts
Pro Includes Quick Text
eM Client seamlessly integrated the Quick Text extension that was available on Thunderbird. This makes it easy to quickly auto-insert dynamic text, based on many variables, saving time and the need to tediously repeat manual text replies.
Pro Chat included
eM Client includes integrated chat, so you don't need another application for chatting with your friends. All common chat services supported (Google chat, Jabber and others).
Pro The only email client which synchronizes Gmail contacts properly
Pro Doesn't replace your attachments with "winmail.dat" files
eM Client sends straight .pdf files for fax messages flawlessly.
Pro It doesn't store all emails on the disc
It saves space, unlike Thunderbird.
Pro It is still the best in this class
But only because it has no alternative.
Pro A perfect companion to your Gmail or other webmail you might have
It provides (almost) complete Gmail functionality (calendar, tasks, chat, contacts), while offering advantages of an application: offline use, more e-mail providers in one place, very good design, support, etc.
Pro Very fast
Cons
Con No option to snooze emails
You can not snooze emails to view later. This makes it hard to keep the inbox clean at all times since you have to read every email and choose to delete or keep them the moment they arrive to do so.
Con Missing lots of advanced features
Out of the box, Mail.app may not have as many features as some other options. This can be mitigated with plugins though. But that is not a perfect solution since third-party plugins may not be very reliable in the long run.
Con Really bad reliability
Database engine gets stuck consuming 100% of one core; crashes; a 40GB log file has been spotted.
Con Updates may break plugins
Apple is known to make API changes to Mail.app when updating which break a lot of plugins.
This can be very annoying for users whose workflow heavily relies on plugins, since they have to wait for plugin developers to make the changes needed to fix any issues brought by the update.
Con Poor performance for some users on El Capitan
Con Ugly
Con Poor calendar integration in exchange mode
Con Extremely slow opening emails
Con Some syncing errors with Hotmail
Happens from time to time.
Con Bloated
Huge size, high memory consumption, uses CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework).
Con Lifetime Upgrades are expensive
Con Account options are not shown under right click
Con Terrrible in handing unread emails
Sorting of unread emails is very useless when compared to other email clients.
Con Poor integration with Yahoo Mail
Integrations with a Yahoo Mail account doesn't always work well in eM Client.
Con Not many options to manage IMAP folders
For example, all emails from Gmail will unnecessary synchronize.
Con Interface is too simple
Many options are too hidden and it takes at least 3 clicks to set them up.
Con No conditional formatting
Con Only has one nice interface/skin
The other available skins has a 90s feel to them.
