When comparing LG 25UM57 vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2540, the Slant community recommends LG 25UM57 for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” LG 25UM57 is ranked 6th while BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 is ranked 68th. The most important reason people chose LG 25UM57 is:
The fact that a monitor of this price range has a 5M:1 contrast ratio is simply astonishing. This means users get cinema-like picture quality right at their desk.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cinema-like picture quality for an affordable price
The fact that a monitor of this price range has a 5M:1 contrast ratio is simply astonishing. This means users get cinema-like picture quality right at their desk.
Pro Good sound quality with no need for external speakers
This monitor's speakers are as good as those found on small TVs. They're located in the back and come with an audio jack for headphone connectivity.
Pro Immersive
The 2560x1080 resolution creates an immersive setup. This applies even for work tasks: multiple documents can be displayed side-by-side with no legibility sacrifice. It's equivalent to having two monitors with 1280x1080 screens.
Pro Advantageous for all uses
This monitor's ultrawide screen has advantages for all uses. When it comes to movie watching or gaming, the screen size contributes to a truly engaging experience. As far as general productivity goes, the ultrawide screen makes it easy to have different applications or documents open side by side.
Pro Great for watching movies
The 21:9 aspect ratio comes in handy when watching movies. This is the default aspect ratio at which almost all of the films are shot. Hence, you can watch your movies without having two black bars at the top and bottom of the screen.
Pro Supports FreeSync
When hooked up with an AMD's graphics card, this monitor doesn't experience problems with screen tearing thanks to its FreeSync support. FreeSync allows the monitor to synchronize its refresh rate with the framerate of your AMD's GPU.
Pro Fast
The BenQ XL2540 is one of the fastest gaming monitors available on the market which makes it an ideal solution for the competitive action gamers out there. The monitor offers the combination of insanely high native refresh rate and low input lag. Additionally, motion doesn't look washed out thanks to the monitor's high pixel response time.
Cons
Con Limited connectivity
This monitor has two HMDI ports, which is pretty good. However, it misses other display inputs such as DVI or Display Port, making incompatible with older computers.
Con Lack of support for ultra-widescreen in (old) games
A handful of games do not support 21:9 aspect ratio by default. Some examples are Overwatch, Fallout 3, and Starcraft 2. If this is important for you, it is recommended you test this issue before getting this monitor. But there are solutions: you can either install fixes (only available for some games) or play in windowed mode, using a different aspect ratio.
Con Slow response time
A response time of 5 ms on a gaming monitor is pretty awful. Considering its refresh rate, it is understandable but not acceptable. Note that this response time is from gray-to-gray.
Con 720p and 1080p videos are sandwhiched
This monitor's aspect ratio means that many online videos, such as those from Netflix or YouTube, will have black spaces on the sides, which can be annoying.
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
