When comparing Pixi.js vs ZoomCharts, the Slant community recommends ZoomCharts for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for creating visualisations of data as charts/graphs?” ZoomCharts is ranked 12th while Pixi.js is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose ZoomCharts is:
ZoomCharts patented technology called Charts-on-Charts, which allows to dynamically build multiple interactive charts inside one canvas object.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Pro Charts-on-Charts
ZoomCharts patented technology called Charts-on-Charts, which allows to dynamically build multiple interactive charts inside one canvas object.
Pro Multi-touch
ZoomCharts is built for mobile devices. All native multi-touch gestures are built in. Data navigation and exploration is as native as it could ever be.
Pro Interactivity
All ZoomCharts products have high level of interactivity available.
Pro Speed & Performance
ZoomCharts are canvas based, as tested with default settings, more than 20 times faster as svg based competitor with same data and default settings. Video available on ZoomCharts youtube channel.
Pro Extensive documentation
Most of ZoomCharts customers do comment that ZoomCharts Documentation is one of the best that they have seen
Pro Fantastic Support
They responded to my issue/question really amazingly fast and that means I didn't have to halt my project development. Also the attitude was great.
Cons
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.
Con Very expensive
