Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing CopyQ vs ClipboardZanager, the Slant community recommends CopyQ for most people. In the question“What are the best clipboard managers for Windows?” CopyQ is ranked 2nd while ClipboardZanager is ranked 11th.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Simple to setup
Pro Easy to use
Pro Free
Pro Add notes or tags to items
Most effective with stacks that don't automatically delete the oldest members, tags and notes allow you to use CopyQ as a personal database for important information with easy access and retrieval.
Pro Cross-platform and cross-DE
CopyQ supports all major Linux desktop environments (including KDE Plasma, GNOME, Xfce, etc.), Windows and MacOS X 10.9+.
Pro Can sort and store based on content type
Built-in support for text, HTML, images or any other custom formats, allowing for type-based clip stacks that each have their own custom actions (open images in a photo editor, open URLs in a browser, etc.)
Pro Browse and filter items in history
Quickly locate that snippet you copied months ago but don't recall precisely what it was.
Pro Safety
Avoid automatically keeping dangerous data and choose which apps must be ignored by the clipboard manager.
Pro Clean UI, cool UX
The app integrates very well to Windows.
Pro Search
Filter your clipboard by type of data, do a search and select the data you want to copy or paste.
Pro Synchronization
Your data syncs accross the cloud with your personal DropBox or OneDrive account to retrieve it on another device.
Pro Performances
Very fast and fluid !
Cons
Con impossible to quit/start copyq via script
Con In linux, it sometimes does not react to shortcuts
Also buggy when hiding.
Con Sometimes copies filtered entries in between selection
Con Can't export images in bulk
Con Slow with many entries
Con Slow to place selected content on editor
Takes a while to place the selected text into the editor.
Con No Mac support
