Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Alead Nolan LiveMICRX2 vs RØDELink Filmmaker Kit, the Slant community recommends Alead Nolan LiveMICRX2 for most people. In the question“What are the best bluetooth microphones (excluding headsets) for mobile devices?” Alead Nolan LiveMICRX2 is ranked 8th while RØDELink Filmmaker Kit is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Alead Nolan LiveMICRX2 is:
The transceiver can still connect to compatible mobile devices directly by Bluetooth. But if latency becomes an issue such as with an echo effect, the included receiver can be used so long as the mobile device in question has a 3.5 mm jack for the receiver to connect to. Having a receiver means the system can be setup to work like a [Chromecast Audio](https://www.google.com/chromecast/audio/) enabling wired speakers or headsets with wireless capabilities. It is possible to use a different Bluetooth receiver than the one the manufacturer made and included in this combo, but YMMV. A [USB to Bluetooth adapter](https://www.amazon.com/Plugable-Bluetooth-Adapter-Raspberry-Compatible/dp/B009ZIILLI/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1494476609&sr=1-1&keywords=usb+to+bluetooth+adapter) was a commonly added item on Amazon for the Nolan LiveMIC2, presumably for laptops and computers with less than Bluetooth 4.1 capabilities, so it's a path well traveled.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Included receiver gives more flexibility and uses for system compared to LiveMIC2
The transceiver can still connect to compatible mobile devices directly by Bluetooth. But if latency becomes an issue such as with an echo effect, the included receiver can be used so long as the mobile device in question has a 3.5 mm jack for the receiver to connect to.
Having a receiver means the system can be setup to work like a Chromecast Audio enabling wired speakers or headsets with wireless capabilities.
It is possible to use a different Bluetooth receiver than the one the manufacturer made and included in this combo, but YMMV. A USB to Bluetooth adapter was a commonly added item on Amazon for the Nolan LiveMIC2, presumably for laptops and computers with less than Bluetooth 4.1 capabilities, so it's a path well traveled.
Pro Potentially better performance for delayed audio issues/ echo effect
Compared to the standalone transciever product from the same company Nolan LiveMIC2. The product description boasts of .02 second latency and that this is 10x lower (faster) compared to other Bluetooth products.
Pro Micro USB port is for charging
With a USB power bank, you can keep the unit running far longer than the estimated battery life.
Pro 8 radio frequencies and hassle-free auto synchronizing
All the user needs to do is pair the transceiver and receiver unit after putting in fresh batteries and that's about it. The paired units will automatically monitor and change to the best radio signal throughout a session. Users have not mentioned any issues with noise even in heavy radio congested areas.
Pro No radio license needed to operate
Cons
Con Latency Lag can still be issue if not using the included reciever
If you use the included receiver, the lag/latency should not be a problem or much reduced at least.
Con Expensive
At this price range, budget analog transceivers and receivers with far better range capabilities are available.
Con Expensive
OW
Con Will need an adaptor to connect receiver to 4 pole TRRS jack on mobile devices
Most smartphones and tablets use 4 pole TRSS headphone/microphone jacks. This product uses 3 pole TRS jacks, so an adapter will be needed.
Con Audio signal disappears when going beyond range
The technology used with this product is digital, the same frequency as wireless routers. When out of range, it just drops the [audio] connection. The flip side is you know that if you have a link, you won't have the creeping noise issues of analog wireless systems when going beyond the range capabilities of the unit.
