When comparing Wolfenstein 3D vs Quake III Arena, the Slant community recommends Quake III Arena for most people. In the question“What are the best FPS game sources to learn game development from?” Quake III Arena is ranked 2nd while Wolfenstein 3D is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Quake III Arena is:
Not many available FPS games have such a high skill ceiling as Quake III Arena, making this a great game to invest time into, for those that want to get to a competitive level.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Decent game mechanics
Involves strategy, a descent amount of interactive objects, and an acceptable class choice.
Pro Worthwhile time investment for competitive play
Not many available FPS games have such a high skill ceiling as Quake III Arena, making this a great game to invest time into, for those that want to get to a competitive level.
Pro Offline LAN support
By using a LAN connection, multiple computers can facilitate multiplayer without the need for an internet connection.
Pro You can easily run the game on low end PC's
Due to the age of the title (released 1999) and the requirements of said title in the modern day, the game can easily be played on just about any PC from the last 10 years.
Pro Plenty of variation with multiple game modes keeps the gameplay fresh
Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch and Capture the Flag are the various modes that players can select within the game. This allows for enough change in gameplay for the user so that the game never gets old too fast.
Cons
Con Low selection of enemies
The gameplay can get stale fast thanks to the low amount of enemies in the game. Shooting the same enemies one after another does not offer that much excitement.
Con Poor quality voice-overs
Given that it is an older title and thus released when studios put little money towards quality voice-overs, Quake III Arena stands out as one of the worst of its kind, not least on account of the game announcer who is one of the main culprits.