When comparing gitssh2 vs Codeberg, the Slant community recommends Codeberg for most people. In the question“What are the best Git web interfaces?” Codeberg is ranked 6th while gitssh2 is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Codeberg is:
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro It's FOSS, (MIT License), and it's self-hosted with an easy install using Composer
In this day and age where security is paramount, running applications on your own secure server, as opposed to giving someone else direct access to your intellectual property by hosting on their infrastructure, is a critical decision that directly affects the security of your work.
Pro Open source
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Pro Intuitive user interface
Easy to mess around and feels very natural in general.
Pro Managed by a non-profit organization
Codeberg is community driven and managed by a non-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany. The servers are also managed by them. In conclusion, your privacy and source code is protected!
Pro Lightweight
Codeberg uses Gitea as its Git software so it's extremely lightweight. Especially compared to Gitlab or Github.
Cons
Con Project is abandoned
Con No Git server
Does not have it's own Git server like Gitea or Gitlab.