Here’s the Deal

Opera Neon vs Basilisk

30 21

222 93

When comparing Opera Neon vs Basilisk, the Slant community recommends Basilisk for most people. In the question“What are the best desktop web browsers?” Basilisk is ranked 23rd while Opera Neon is ranked 51st. The most important reason people chose Basilisk is:

So the source code can be verified.

Specs

Based OnChromium

Browser EngineBlink

LicenseProprietary

Default Search EngineGoogle

Based OnMozilla Firefox

Browser EngineGoanna (Gecko-fork)

LicenseOpenSource (MPL)

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best desktop web browsers?

Pros

Pro
Modern look

It is a very modern version of Opera. It looks like a desktop app instead of a web browser.

Pro
Futuristic interface

Opera Neon innovates with its clean aesthetic pleasing interface.

Pro
Open Source

So the source code can be verified.

Cons

Con
Owned by Chinese Consortium

Pretends to be a Norwegian company, but is actually a Chinese company. Opera does not respect user privacy and is not trustworthy!

Con
Not meant for general use

This browser is not meant for general use. It only exists, because the Opera developers had some ideas for the user-interface, and wanted their users' feedback. If you want a browser that you can use day-to-day, something with bookmarks and security updates, look elsewhere.

Con
Bad UX

The usability is not the best since the left and right bar take up space and there is no way to resize them.

Con
Never updated

The Opera folks came out with a browser as an experiment - and then they essentially abandoned it. It really was great, but since they never planned to support/update it and it's closed-source, it's not recommended.

Con
No Adblock

There is no Adblocker like in the original Opera.

Con
No extension support

Due to the way the browser is built, it does not support Chrome extensions even though it is Chromium based. Opera extensions are not supported either.