When comparing PDF Studio Viewer vs qpdfview, the Slant community recommends qpdfview for most people. In the question“What are the best PDF viewers for Linux?” qpdfview is ranked 4th while PDF Studio Viewer is ranked 6th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Responsive to critiques
They are actively looking for ways to improving their products. For example, they made some improvements in PDF Studio 2018 after a PCWorld review came out in 2017.
Pro The Only Complete PDF editing/viewer tool available for all platforms (Windows, MacOS, Linux, Unix)
It GUI is user friendly and well designed with its ribbon menu. It's actually very similar to what you can find in a MS Word or Adobe Pro environment. It has all the features you can imagine for commenting/marking the PDF, creating forms, and editing PDF files. It is available on all platforms: Windows, MacOS, AND LINUX.
Pro Digital signatures
PDF Studio Viewer is the only free PDF viewer for Linux that recognized digital signatures from docusign in a way that lets you easily verify the signatures.
Pro Advanced print & search options
PDF Studio Pro is a really useful PDF editor. This is more like Adobe Acrobat earlier versions, in terms of look and feel. That’s user friendly. Command icons are clear with tooltip already written. Menu is elaborated well break-up. Also, all the functions seems to be available.
Pro Measurement tools
Pro PRO Suitable for both basic users and more advanced Acrobat veterans
I was looking for a decent alternative to Acrobat, as it was the last thing my dad needed to make the switch to Linux. Tired of paying per month for proprietary software I wouldn't actually own, I went on a quest to find multi-platform PDF editing software. Unfortunately, it isn't FOSS, however, the license is owned in perpetuity and you are helping out lesser known devs who've made a great product. Pros * All of the features needed for the average acrobat user. * Edit, merge comment, measure, tools suitable for both basic users and more advanced Acrobat veterans. * Speed. Even in a VM using a paltry 1 GB of ram, I was able to merge multiple documents and watermark effortlessly. I generated a study guide from handwritten notes in seconds. * Create from the scanner is incredibly useful. * Multiplatform compatibility
Pro PDF Studio Viewer is the fastest PDF viewer on Linux
It'd be nice if a FOSS source viewer were out in front here, but sadly not. It would be even nicer if PDF and Adobe's dead hand hadn't become the standard doc format. but sadly we have to live with this.
Pro User-friendly advanced printing
The easiest software I found for printing multiple pages on Linux Mint. All other software require inputting pages by numbers, here, you can just select the ones you want to print, choose the format of multiple pages (horizontal/vertical) and it all comes with a beautiful gui. I used to love adobe and foxit on windows, but those programs suck on linux.
Pro Loupe tool
Pro As of 2018 supports text, markup & graphical annotations, as well as form filling
Pro Low on resources
Pro Reloads on changes instantly
Pro Outline, properties and thumbnail panes
Pro Open multiple pdfs in tabs
qpdfview is a tabbed document viewer.
Pro Allows for some scripting
Opens files in named instances, open files on designated page.
Calling of userscripts on a document is thus far not possible.
Pro Fast search in all opened files
Pro Dark mode
However only inverted colors.
Pro Scale, rotate and fit
Pro Supports TOC-sidebar
Pro Switch tabs with keyboard shortcuts
Pro Continuous and multiple-page layouts
Pro Add highlights and text annotations
Pro DjVu support
Pro Fullscreen and presentation views
Pro PostScript support
Pro Custom background colors
It is available on any major computer OS.
Pro Deactivation of GUI elements
Pro Supports thumbnail preview
Pro Input forms are editable
Con Proprietary software
This is proprietary software using a freeware model. It is not open-source.
Con Requires Java!
What's the most bloated runtime platform in the history of computing? Java! This app actually tried to install a JVM on my machine without asking... not having it.
Con CON Free version add a watermark
The free version will add a watermark, which is kind of annoying but I guess necessary for them.
Con Extra features require payment
Any feature not included in the freeware version requires purchasing a license to upgrade.
Con Deadly slow on complex pdf files
Con File information missing page size
Con No multiple mapping of commands
Having two key mappings to execute the moveUp command doesn't seem to be possible.
Con Configuration intended via GUI
There is no explicit documentation of configuration parameters used in qpdfview.conf and shortcuts.conf (those are the most important ones). However the files are editable conveniently, which is of value.