Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing module-concat vs Angular, the Slant community recommends Angular for most people. In the question“What are the best frontend JavaScript module bundlers?” Angular is ranked 9th while module-concat is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Angular is:
Very good CLI and webpack, bundling, testing, deployment support. Deep TypeScript integration and support.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports Client-side Browser Projects
Provides some support for concatenating client-side browser JavaScript modules. Also, can process the browser property in package.json.
Pro Supports languages that compile to JS
For example, CoffeeScript is supported using the compilers option.
Pro Lightweight
This library just concatenates CommonJS modules together into a single *.js file. Nothing else. It only uses 1 dependency: resolve
Pro Great tooling and language support
Very good CLI and webpack, bundling, testing, deployment support. Deep TypeScript integration and support.
Cons
Con Not a full-featured bundler
This doesn't handle CSS or HTML stuff. It only bundles JavaScript files.
Con Slightly over-engineered
Very enterprisey - made for huge architectures and with tons of declarative, non-intuitive annotations it makes it overkill for very small projects.
Con Native i18n support over-engineered
Not developer-friendly. Switching languages need reloading the whole page. There are third party solutions that work better.
