When comparing MindMup vs Coda, the Slant community recommends MindMup for most people. In the question“What are the best Evernote alternatives?” MindMup is ranked 13th while Coda is ranked 47th. The most important reason people chose MindMup is:
MindMup allows focusing on thoughts and productively capture them without getting in the way.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Frictionless interface
MindMup allows focusing on thoughts and productively capture them without getting in the way.
Pro Browser-based
Don't need to install anything, just open the website and you are set.
Pro Just works
Pro Compatible with Google Drive and Github
Pro Easy sharing & presenting
After taking notes, it only takes seconds to share and/or prepare them for presentations.
Pro Free and open source
MindMup is free with source code available on GitHub.
Pro Live Preview mode
Makes styling a site in CSS simpler.
Pro Built-in FTP client
Publishing your changes to the web server is a one-click operation. That is, one click per file, or one click for all your changed files. Or even cherry-pick the files to be published in the next batch.
Pro Built-in support for Git and Subversion
Although the software doesn't ship with these libraries, it does work once you have one installed.
Pro Mature
Coda has been developed by Panic exclusively for Mac since 2007. The experience of the developers shows in the stability and polish of their product.
Pro Many plugins available
There is a huge library of user-created plugins, ranging from additional syntax modes, to code validation and beautification, to reference materials, code snippets, text actions and more.
Cons
Con Note capacity is limited
MindMup is good for mapping out thoughts that could be summarized in bullet points, but longer notes aren't as practical for this service.
Con Unconventional note taking style
It's a mind mapping application, not a traditional text based note storage platform.
Con Hasn't been updated in 2 years.
Con Expensive
The price of $99 is more than many other editors.
