When comparing Standard Notes vs Logseq, the Slant community recommends Standard Notes for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform note-taking app?” Standard Notes is ranked 5th while Logseq is ranked 22nd. The most important reason people chose Standard Notes is:
Notes are encrypted and secured so only you can decrypt them.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Encrypted
Notes are encrypted and secured so only you can decrypt them.
Pro Extensible
Editors, components, actions, and themes.
Pro Open-source
Pro Simple
Faster and lighter than most notes apps.
Pro Cross-platform
Available on Web, Mac, Windows, iOS, Android, and Linux.
Pro Themes
Pro Privacy-first
Logseq is a privacy-first tool for thought.
Pro Networked notes
Similar to Roam's technique of letting the notes flow with links to each other.
Pro Local-first software
Every topic is its own flat file. Nothing is better than keeping your data in the file system with an option of git source control or online backup.
https://www.inkandswitch.com/local-first/
Pro Daily journal is capture on Steriods
The daily journal feature allows you to quickly capture disparate topics under today's date and by way of tags make things organized and findable from any topic page.
Pro Open source
Logseq is opensource.
Pro Structured data over willy-nilly formatting
Lots of apps are too graphically flexible in how they allow content to be entered, placed, and formatted. They act like Word when what you want when authoring content is Markdown. Content and semantic structure, not graphical frills.
Pro Org syntax
Logseq support Emacs Org syntax out of the box.
Cons
Con Formatting enabled only as extension for money
Con Keyboard-driven editing/navigating is descent but average
It is only because I was a long-time Checkvist user that I say this. Checkvist has keyboard-driven controls which are in a league of their own.
Con Still in Alpha
Logseq is still in Alpha and is under heavy development.