When comparing Mudbox vs Mari, the Slant community recommends Mari for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D texture painting softwares?” Mari is ranked 8th while Mudbox is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Mari is:
Though it is expensive, if you wish to use it continuously you can constantly renew your trial with lovely fake emails. Learning this can benefit your career into games or film.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro True 3D and projective painting
Pro Supports UV-less PTEX painting
Pro Subscribe for as little as $10/month, $80/year
Pro Artist-friendly tools
Mudbox offers intuitive, easy-to-learn and use sculpting and painting tools that are a joy to use.
Pro Easy to use
Pro Unlimited 8K paint layers
Pro Academy Award-winning toolset, originally developed at Weta Digital.
Pro Free Trial
Though it is expensive, if you wish to use it continuously you can constantly renew your trial with lovely fake emails. Learning this can benefit your career into games or film.
Pro FIlm Industry Usage
Though Substance Painter is catching up to Mari in terms of texturing wiht higher res textures, this program is what is used in tandem with Zbrush most commonly in Film. For the Game industry it is Substance Painter and Zbrush.
Pro Great at handling large texture sets
Mari can handle 32K textures since 2010. It was used in creating the characters faces and such in the Avatar movie, as close-ups require such high-res textures.
Cons
Con Its from Autodesk
Nobody should use Autodesk derived products.The 3d industry is really contaminated with Autodesk monopoly and abuse of inflated prices that everybody seems willing to pay. Enough is enough.
Con The most expensive one yet
Not made for hobbyists or indie game developers.