Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Mudbox vs Quixel Mixer, the Slant community recommends Quixel Mixer for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D texture painting softwares?” Quixel Mixer is ranked 5th while Mudbox is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Quixel Mixer is:
Its freaking free.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Pros
Pro True 3D and projective painting
Pro Supports UV-less PTEX painting
Pro Subscribe for as little as $10/month, $80/year
Pro Artist-friendly tools
Mudbox offers intuitive, easy-to-learn and use sculpting and painting tools that are a joy to use.
Pro Easy to use
Pro Unlimited 8K paint layers
Pro Academy Award-winning toolset, originally developed at Weta Digital.
Pro Free
Its freaking free.
Cons
Con Its from Autodesk
Nobody should use Autodesk derived products.The 3d industry is really contaminated with Autodesk monopoly and abuse of inflated prices that everybody seems willing to pay. Enough is enough.
Con Seems to still be in beta
Many features missing, like layer deletion.
Con Free version is technically non-commercial only
But, uh, "exporting" is as easy as opening up the file locations.