WebUI vs Material UI
When comparing WebUI vs Material UI, the Slant community recommends Material UI for most people. In the question“What is the best CSS framework?” Material UI is ranked 8th while WebUI is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Material UI is:
Really nice implementation so far
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Scalable CSS transform and SVG shapes
WebUI includes scalable CSS transform shapes and scalable clip-path shapes.
Pro Supports build customisation
Build customisation allows components that aren't required to be excluded using SASS includes and grunt tasks.
Pro Full support for flexbox
WebUI includes a full range of flexbox classes, including breakpoint specific classes based on REM units.
Pro Multiple grid systems out of the box
WebUI includes a flexbox, a table, and standard grid systems. These grid types can be used in combination and together.
Pro Generic design
Every component is built to be generic and interchangeable. For example, there are no restrictions on where grids, containers, menu buttons, or dropdowns can be used.
Pro Powerful tooltip system
The tooltip system includes viewport boundary collision detection, auto positioning and auto sizing for small viewport areas, configurable boundary margins, and many behavioral settings, such as focus, hover, static, nohide.
Pro Adheres really well to the material design standard
Really nice implementation so far
Pro Perfect for React projects
Really convenient and easy to use components
Cons
Con Active development means API changes are frequent
Might be a problem for large projects, but since active development is a good thing, you should consider this rather mild inconvenience weighed against the benefits.