When comparing ClipAngel vs PhraseExpress, the Slant community recommends ClipAngel for most people. In the question“What are the best clipboard manager?” ClipAngel is ranked 3rd while PhraseExpress is ranked 5th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro CTRL+ENTER pastes selected or all text as plain text
Pro Supports comparing clipboards
Can be used to compare different clipboards.
Pro Great support
All bugs are being fixed very quick.
Pro Shows image fragments in list
When doing copy-paste with many images, quick visual search in list is very important. ClipAngel shows representative fragment for every image clip in list without rescale. So it is very easy to find proper image.
Pro Versalite and feature rich
At first you don't see it, but then you find more and more features using tooltips everywhere.
Pro HTML native formatting view
HTML clips by default are shown in native formatting.
Pro No subscription. Perpetual license
Unlike other text expanders, PhraseExpress is a one time purchase.
Pro Flexible shortcut system
Offers many options for autotext.
Pro Easy to use
Very clear and thoughtful user interface.
Pro Versions for Mac, Windows, iOS, and Android
Pro Supports RTF formatting and Word documents
Pro Sophisticated macro language
It has many macro functions. Macros can be combined and nested.
Pro Phrase menu
Pro Document generator
Pro Portable option
Can run from a USB device.
Pro Does not force to use a cloud service
It can run standalone without the need to connect to the Internet.
Pro Works with Mac and Windows and iPhone
There are versions for all platforms, that can synchronize snippets.
Pro Fill-In forms with may options
You cannot only add simple text input but also radio buttons, check boxes, etc.
Pro Clipboard Manager with cool extra features
If email addresses or URL are part of the clipboard contents, PE offers you to send an email to that address or to open the web site.
Pro Includes Outlook addon to automate email replies
Con Classical User Interface
User interface seems old
Con Bitdefender may see it as malware
Con Not enough clips on display in window
Con Big memory consumption
It takes up to 80-90MB of RAM.
Con No Linux version
Some people might want it.