When comparing Google Cloud Source Repositories vs Codeberg, the Slant community recommends Codeberg for most people. In the question“What are the best hosted version control services?” Codeberg is ranked 5th while Google Cloud Source Repositories is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Codeberg is:
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Free tier
Cloud Source Repositories is free for up to 5 project-users per billing account. The free tier comes with up to 50GB free storage total and 50GB free egress per month.
Pro Excellent security
Everything is stored encrypted in Google's datacenters. You can give fine grained control to other Google accounts and collaborate.
Pro Integrated with other Google Cloud Platform services
Trigger deployments or create custom integrations using Google Cloud Pub/Sub, deploy directly to App Engine or Cloud Functions, and use Cloud Build for CI. Check out code securely (Service Accounts) from your Cloud Compute instances or Container Engine images. View logs in Stackdriver.
Pro Open source
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Pro Intuitive user interface
Easy to mess around and feels very natural in general.
Pro Managed by a non-profit organization
Codeberg is community driven and managed by a non-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany. The servers are also managed by them. In conclusion, your privacy and source code is protected!
Pro Lightweight
Codeberg uses Gitea as its Git software so it's extremely lightweight. Especially compared to Gitlab or Github.
Cons
Con No inline editing
Unlike some other popular repositories, there is no way to edit inline directly from the source browser. Although, you can easily open up a Theia-based IDE in the browser to edit and run your code by clicking the "Open in Cloud Shell" button. You will still have to commit your changes from the Cloud Shell command line, though.
Con Markdown styling is not as good as GitHub or GitLab
Your README files will not render as nicely as GitHub and GitLab, which may irritate you if you're migrating your repos with nicely-formatted docs.
Con Must set-up billing account
For all Google Cloud Platform projects you must enable Billing. This isn't uncommon for cloud hosting providers but it still could be considered a CON.
