Here’s the Deal

Onkyo W800BT vs Erato Apollo 7

5 0

19 1

When comparing Onkyo W800BT vs Erato Apollo 7, the Slant community recommends Erato Apollo 7 for most people. In the question“What are the best high end, wireless in-ear headphones? ” Erato Apollo 7 is ranked 2nd while Onkyo W800BT is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Erato Apollo 7 is:

Bluetooth connectivity is very stable and rarely cuts off. This is a stark contrast to many true wireless in-ears today, where the signal cuts off on a regular basis. This ensures that you will have a continuous music listening experience with very little annoying drops and music pauses.

Specs

TypeIn-Ears & Earbuds

Battery Life2 to 3 Hours (Playback)

ConnectivityBluetooth 4.1

Frequency Response20Hz - 20,000Hz

Impedance16 Ohms

Splash ResistantYes

Weight4 grams

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best high end, wireless in-ear headphones?

Pros

Pro
Clean and airy highs, warm and natural sounding mids with punchy bass

Instead of being bloated and overpowering, the bass is punchy and fast so while these will not be able to produce a lot of rumble. Thump should be satisfying for most users. The highs are nice and airy with a lot of detail yet never become harsh, so these are not fatiguing to listen to. The mids sound very natural and jump out just enough to make vocals and guitars very easy to hear and appreciate.

These should work best for more vocal and instrument focused genres like jazz, rock, classical and the like. Bass heavy tracks will still sound good with these, though these headphones will not be able to give the deep bass that bass lovers will be after.

Pro
Carrying case functions as portable charger

The carrying case has an internal battery, and with a full charge, can supply the headphones with 5 full charges on the go.

Pro
Good soundstage width

The soundstage that these produce gives the music an open feel with good instrument separation. This quality will help give the listener an immersive music listening experience.

Pro
Stable wireless connection

Pro
Clear and airy highs, full and forward mids with good punch on the bass

The highs are nice and detailed yet still sound smooth. The mids are full, forward and detailed so vocals can easily be heard. Bass is not bloated, and instead is tight and has good punch.

This sound signature offers a lot more clarity and airiness compared to most true-wireless in-ears which usually are bass heavy. While the punch in the low-end makes the Apollo 7 good enough to use for hip-hop, dance and bass-centric music, they perform best in acoustic, rock or classical tracks.

Pro
Can resist splashes of liquid

A nano coating is applied on the headphones for splash resistance. Getting these wet by rain or sweat are not likely to cause problems.

Pro
Single multi-function button can control basic smartphone/music player functions

There is a single button on one earpiece. Various actions on the button like a single tap, a long press, double presses and the like will allow you to play/pause tracks, control volume as well as answer/end calls.

Pro
These can be charged on the go

An aluminum transport case is included which features an internal battery. It allows you to charge these headphones even when on the move.

Ad
Cons

Con
No remote control

The button on the W800BT only allows for powering on or off the device. Users will not be able to adjust volume, play/pause tracks or accept/end calls. This can be quite inconvenient, especially when you need to use the aforementioned functions when on the go.

Con
Battery life is not very good

From a full charge, the W800BT can only last around 2 to 3 hours of playback time before you need to put them back into the case to charge.

Con
Cannot track fitness stats

These do not have fitness tracking capabilities like heart rate monitoring, distance covered and the like. A number of true wireless headphones on the other hand have this feature.