Here’s the Deal

Devuan GNU+Linux vs Garuda Linux

643 105

252 43

When comparing Devuan GNU+Linux vs Garuda Linux, the Slant community recommends Devuan GNU+Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Devuan GNU+Linux is ranked 6th while Garuda Linux is ranked 26th. The most important reason people chose Devuan GNU+Linux is:

It is stable like Debian.

Specs

Based OnDebian

Default Desktop EnvironmentXFCE

Init-SystemSysVinit, runit or OpenRC

Initial Release2016

Main UsageServers, Industry(Stable/Oldstable) | Desktop, Multimedia(Testing/Unstable)

OS FamilyGNU/Linux

Official Supported Architecturesaarch64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64le, amd64

OriginWorldwide

Package Managerdpkg with apt, aptitude or apt-build

Release ScheduleLong-term support (stable edition) and rolling release (testing and unstable editions)

Release TypeBinary

Desktop Environmentsx11

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?

What are the best Linux distributions for KDE Plasma 5?

What is the best laptop OS?

What are the best Linux distributions for misanthropes?

What are the best Linux distributions for beginners?

What are the best Linux distros?

Pros

Pro
Stability

It is stable like Debian.

Pro
It's Debian

Devuan is Debian just without systemd, it just mirrors the the Debian archive and repacks packages that have hard dependencies on systemd.

Pro
Excellent for normal people

It is easy to use and is a good choice for beginners.

Pro
No Systemd

Pro
Most decent look amongst other XFCE distros

Default XFCE theme is unique of all the XFCE distos including MXLinux, Xubuntu etc.

Pro
Super-fast

Uses vram, and a zen kernel.

Pro
Themes

The dr460nized KDE theme is awesome.

Pro
Easy entrance to Arch Linux

Filled to the brim with lots of quality-of-life changes and optimizations that are simple enough for long-time Windows, long-time Mac users, and Arch newbies to understand. Though, it also leads to bloat or not necessarily helpful extra software. If you're not into the "bloat" added in, try checking out the barebones version, you'll need to know a lot of things bout Arch to fully use barebones.

Pro
Highly customized interface

You already have most of the customization done for you out of the box.

Pro
Unused RAM is wasted RAM

It takes just a bit more RAM than Manjaro. Edit: This statement is only true if it helps the user and since this could be running on a low end machine this will not.

Ad
Cons

Con
Difficult to install on non-free hardware

Unlike Debian, Devuan offers no unfree netinstall media, so if your system needs unfree drivers (e.g a laptop or a tablet), you'll have to download the Debian firmware on a separate USB.

Con
No systemd

Con
Fragmentation

Forked distributions like Devuan and Artix fragment the Linux community and hurt the original project. Debian users who do not want systemd should use Slackware or BSD instead.