When comparing Dell U3818DW vs HP VH240a, the Slant community recommends Dell U3818DW for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” Dell U3818DW is ranked 75th while HP VH240a is ranked 245th. The most important reason people chose Dell U3818DW is:
You might experience the effect of immersion while working with the U3818DW thanks to its massive size and curvature which, combined, make up that feeling of extra immersion.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Has a curve
You might experience the effect of immersion while working with the U3818DW thanks to its massive size and curvature which, combined, make up that feeling of extra immersion.
Pro Good for multitasking
This option is ideal for the fans of multi-tasking since its massive, 38-inch 3840x1600 pixel panel can seamlessly fit three Word documents stacked side by side. That's a lot of space for a single monitor.
Pro Excellent picture quality in well-lit enviromnent
Placed in a bright room, the Dell U3818DW offers exceptional overall picture quality thanks to its ability to reproduce accurate and vivid colors as well as some reasonably inky shadows. Colors look crisp and lifelike because of the monitor's high-quality IPS panel that genuinely bright without losing the color accuracy.
Pro Adjustable
You'll have no problem fitting this monitor into your working environment thanks to the generous range of ergonomic adjustments the VH240a supports. Its stand support tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustments.
Pro Exceptional value for the money
The HP VH240a does offer a lot for its price. You'll be hard-pressed trying to find another 23.8-inch display that has the picture quality of the VH240a in the sub $120 range.
Cons
Con Bad for action gaming
The Dell U3818DW is not the best pick for action gaming because of its low responsiveness. The action gaming feels laggy because of the monitor's high input lag and low native refresh rate.
Con Bad for action gaming
The HP VH240a cannot provide responsive and smooth gaming experience because its panel has low native refresh rate and high input lag.
