Here’s the Deal

Yesod vs N2O

49 11

9 2

When comparing Yesod vs N2O, the Slant community recommends Yesod for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Yesod is ranked 12th while N2O is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Yesod is:

While not required, Yesod offers templating through a Shakespearean family of languages to produce page code.

Specs

Pricefree

LicenseMIT

Repositoryhttps://github.com/yesodweb/yesod

Written inHaskell

PriceFREE

Default ORMKVS

Default Template EngineNITRO

EncodingsJSON, BERT/ETF, XML

HostsCOWBOY, EMQ

Initial Release0.4

ProtocolsHEART, FTP, NITRO

SecurityHMAC AES/CBC-128

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best backend web frameworks?

Pros

Pro
Offers templating for type-safe, well-formed content

While not required, Yesod offers templating through a Shakespearean family of languages to produce page code.

Pro
Uses type-safe URLs

Ensures that data provided by the URL is type-safe. This means that data in the URL has a definitive type.

Pro
Can be used without knowing much Haskell

While Yesod is written in Haskell, developers can achieve basic functionality without much investment in the language.

Pro
Fast binary data

Pro
Binary encoding and protocols

Here is a list of types of endpoints which are supported by EMQ and accesible to N2O apps: WebSockets, MQTT, MQTT-SN, TCP, UDP, CoAP. Normal use of N2O as a Web Framework or a Web Application Server is through WebSockets, but for IoT and MQTT applications it could be served through UDP or SCTP protocols providing application level message delivery consistency.

Ad
Cons

Con
Is hard to customize

Learning how Yesod works internally is hard. It is a large framework with complicated components. Finding the appropriate code and understanding how it contributes to the framework is difficult, meaning developers will struggle.