Here’s the Deal

Yesod vs Actix

49 11

73 26

When comparing Yesod vs Actix, the Slant community recommends Yesod for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Yesod is ranked 12th while Actix is ranked 22nd. The most important reason people chose Yesod is:

While not required, Yesod offers templating through a Shakespearean family of languages to produce page code.

Specs

Written inHaskell

LicenseMIT

Pricefree

Repositoryhttps://github.com/yesodweb/yesod

Written inRust

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best backend web frameworks?

Pros

Pro
Offers templating for type-safe, well-formed content

While not required, Yesod offers templating through a Shakespearean family of languages to produce page code.

Pro
Uses type-safe URLs

Ensures that data provided by the URL is type-safe. This means that data in the URL has a definitive type.

Pro
Can be used without knowing much Haskell

While Yesod is written in Haskell, developers can achieve basic functionality without much investment in the language.

Pro
Blazingly fast

Pro
Feature-rich

Actix provides a lot of features out of box. WebSockets, HTTP/2, pipelining etc

Pro
Type-safe

Forget about stringly typed objects, from request to response, everything has types

Pro
Extensible

Easily create your own libraries that any Actix application can use

Ad
Cons

Con
Is hard to customize

Learning how Yesod works internally is hard. It is a large framework with complicated components. Finding the appropriate code and understanding how it contributes to the framework is difficult, meaning developers will struggle.