Here’s the Deal

Monofur vs Dina

46 8

45 11

When comparing Monofur vs Dina, the Slant community recommends Dina for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” Dina is ranked 31st while Monofur is ranked 35th. The most important reason people chose Dina is:

Dina is compact, sharp, and easy to read.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best programming fonts?

Pros

Pro
It's simple, beautiful, and stylish

Pro
Great for your eyes

Monofur is very legible. Even after staring at it for hours, your eyes won't get tired.

Pro
Letterforms are highly distinct

The font is very legible due to the distinguished characters it contains.

Pro
Great appearance

Dina is compact, sharp, and easy to read.

Pro
Compact yet readable

One of the most compact fonts while still being readable. More lines on screen while still passing basic readability check than Consolas, Courier new, Cascadia Mono, Hack, and Crisp. 8, 9, and 10 point are all fantastic.

Pro
A really clean programming font

Neat and simple.

Ad
Cons

Con
Lacks bold+italic

Monofur has a regular italic and bold typeface, but it lacks bold+italic. Syntax-capable editors can better display code based on function/class/context/markup work when at least 4 families are available to display.

Con
Only characters from the Western charset work in many Windows apps

The font includes all characters for all European languages; however, in most programs using Unicode (such as WordPad or MS Word), only languages using Western charset can use this font. These include English, German, French, Spanish, and Norwegian.
Trying to use any languages like Czech, Hungarian (Central European), Bulgarian, Russian (Cyrillic), or Greek will make the font switch back to default font like Arial or Calibri, even though Monofur itself includes characters for those languages.
Authors didn't bother fixing the non-working Baltic / Central European / Greek / Cyrillic / Turkish character set for those years.