squirrelly vs swig
When comparing squirrelly vs swig, the Slant community recommends swig for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript templating engines?” swig is ranked 14th while squirrelly is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose swig is:
Available for node.js and major web browsers
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Blazing Fast
In most templating benchmarks, Squirrelly equals or outperforms the speed of other templating engines.
Pro Rich and customizable features
Squirrelly supports custom helpers, partials, and filters.
Pro Not language-bound
Squirrelly isn't tied to a specific language, like HTML. That means that you can use it to generate files of all kinds, from Markdown to JavaScript to SVGs.
Pro No whitespace worries
Squirrelly is not whitespace sensitive.
Pro Super simple
Squirrelly has syntax like Mustache or Swig, and you can write your first template in a few minutes! It also works with ExpressJS right out of the box.
Pro Works both on the client and on the server
Available for node.js and major web browsers
Pro Does not hide HTML
Swig does not abstract HTML syntax from you (like e.g. Jade does) giving a certain filling of control over the markup.
Cons
Con No updates for at least 6 months
Swig has not received any new commits since June 25 2015.