Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Google Cloud Storage vs Aerobatic, the Slant community recommends Aerobatic for most people. In the question“What are the best website hosting providers?” Aerobatic is ranked 14th while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Aerobatic is:
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Cheap (about $0.01/GB/Month)
Same price a Google Drive, but more flexible as you pay for what you use (Google Drive you have to jump from 100 MB to 1 TB for example). Also supports larger backups.
Pro Optionally supports versioning
Versioning can be enabled at no extra cost so you may retrieve older versions or deleted files.
Pro Works with duplicity
duplicity allows to encrypt data locally using GPG and it supports Google Cloud Storage.
Pro Can be shared with other people
Via the Google Cloud Platform or their CLI tool, you can create publicly accessible URLs to parts of your data.
Pro Custom domains
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Pro Custom error pages
Create your own 404 error pages.
Pro Password protection
Pro Multiple deploy stages
Easily deploy to a preview instance with a unique URL
Pro Versioning
Each push creates a new version of your site. Aerobatic maintains up to 50 previous versions of your site, all accessible from the own unique URL.
Pro Deploy alerts
Pro API Proxy
Helpful for calling APIs that are not CORS enabled. Also allows injection of environment variables to keep secrets out of the client-side code.
Pro Free Tier
Pro Bitbucket integration
Edit your code, push your changes, and your site is live automatically (fast).
Cons
Con No FTP access
Doesn't provide FTP access to upload files or edit the database on the go.
