When comparing Google Cloud Storage vs Aerobatic, the Slant community recommends Aerobatic for most people. In the question“What is the best static website hosting provider?” Aerobatic is ranked 13th while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 14th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Cheap (about $0.01/GB/Month)
Same price a Google Drive, but more flexible as you pay for what you use (Google Drive you have to jump from 100 MB to 1 TB for example). Also supports larger backups.
Pro Optionally supports versioning
Versioning can be enabled at no extra cost so you may retrieve older versions or deleted files.
Pro Works with duplicity
duplicity allows to encrypt data locally using GPG and it supports Google Cloud Storage.
Pro Can be shared with other people
Via the Google Cloud Platform or their CLI tool, you can create publicly accessible URLs to parts of your data.
Pro Deploy alerts
Pro Multiple deploy stages
Easily deploy to a preview instance with a unique URL
Pro Password protection
Pro Custom error pages
Create your own 404 error pages.
Pro Custom domains
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Pro API Proxy
Helpful for calling APIs that are not CORS enabled. Also allows injection of environment variables to keep secrets out of the client-side code.
Pro Free Tier
Pro Bitbucket integration
Edit your code, push your changes, and your site is live automatically (fast).
Each push creates a new version of your site. Aerobatic maintains up to 50 previous versions of your site, all accessible from the own unique URL.
Con No FTP access
Doesn't provide FTP access to upload files or edit the database on the go.