When comparing Redux vs Vue.js, the Slant community recommends Vue.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for state management?” Vue.js is ranked 1st while Redux is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Vue.js is:
Vue can easily be integrated with other front-end libraries. This makes it an extremely versatile tool and it's easy to fix its shortcomings or missing features by just plugging in another library.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Borrows heavily from functional programming concepts
Redux's concepts are heavily influenced by functional programming languages. It is built on data immutability, and makes use of several functional programming features such as currying (usually seen in Redux middlewares).
Pro Supports server-rendering
Redux supports server-rendering.
Pro Extremely lightweight
At only 2kB it's an extremely lightweight library.
Pro Changes to state are made with pure functions
Reducers are pure functions that returns the next state based on the previous state and an action (describing what should be changed). Since they are pure functions, they return a new state object instead of modifying the existing state. This ensures that it doesn't affect anything outside of the function's scope, making it free from unintended side effects and also makes debugging easier.
Pro Lots of third-party resources online
Since it's such a popular library, there's plenty of tutorials, guides, or other third-party resources online.
Pro State is predictable
In Redux, the state of your application is held in a single object. The only way to change the state is to emit an action describing the change — there is no way to mutate state from the view, callbacks, or anywhere else. This makes the state of your application predictable and objective, and reduces the chances of any unintended state mutation by a callback somewhere else in your code.
Pro Can be used with many UI libraries/frameworks
Redux is most commonly used with React, but it can also be used with other UI libraries — Redux is strictly for state management only, thus it is agnostic to your front-end stack.
Pro Can be used with any front-end stack
Vue can easily be integrated with other front-end libraries. This makes it an extremely versatile tool and it's easy to fix its shortcomings or missing features by just plugging in another library.
Pro Single file component
Very useful.
Pro Lightweight
Vue.js weighs in at 16kb min+gzip.
Pro Vuex store, events system
Pro Reactivity system
Pro CLI and Webpack integration
Pro Responsive server-side rendering
Since most of the mainstream server-side rendering implementations are synchronous, they can block the server's event loop when the application is complex.
Vue implements streaming server-side rendering, which allows you to render your component, get a readable stream and directly pipe that to the HTTP response. This allows you to have a responsive server and decreases the time your users have to wait before they get your rendered content.
Pro Supports inline templating
Although you can build components in JavaScript files, you can also use inline handlebars-like templating in your HTML views where simplicity is often a more sane choice.
Pro Can be made even lighter
Since the template-to-virtual-DOM and compiler can be separated, you can compile the templates in your machine and then deploying only the interpreter which is 12KB minified and gzipped.
Pro Support for both templates and JSX
You can choose to use either a templating language, or if you feel it's necessary to drop on a lower virtual-dom level, you can use JSX. This is simply done by replacing the template
option with a render
function.
Or alternatively, you can embed functions inside templates by using the <render>
tag.
Pro SEO friendly
Starting with Vue 2.0, Vue supports server-side rendering. This helps with SEO a lot, since the views are rendered directly on the server, which are indexed by search engines.
Pro VueRouter
Cons
Con Codebases can overuse it
Redux is great for state that's required in many disparate parts of the DOM, but frequently you see projects use it to hold all state, instead of just using props. It might be good if more could be done in the official docs to guide developers in when not to use it!
Con Steep learning curve
Redux's pattern can be unintuitive and hard to grasp, especially if you have not worked with functional languages before.
Con Poor typescript support
Very basic typescript support.