When comparing Redux vs Webix, the Slant community recommends Redux for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for state management?” Redux is ranked 3rd while Webix is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Redux is:
Redux's concepts are heavily influenced by functional programming languages. It is built on data immutability, and makes use of several functional programming features such as currying (usually seen in Redux middlewares).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Borrows heavily from functional programming concepts
Redux's concepts are heavily influenced by functional programming languages. It is built on data immutability, and makes use of several functional programming features such as currying (usually seen in Redux middlewares).
Pro Supports server-rendering
Redux supports server-rendering.
Pro Extremely lightweight
At only 2kB it's an extremely lightweight library.
Pro Changes to state are made with pure functions
Reducers are pure functions that returns the next state based on the previous state and an action (describing what should be changed). Since they are pure functions, they return a new state object instead of modifying the existing state. This ensures that it doesn't affect anything outside of the function's scope, making it free from unintended side effects and also makes debugging easier.
Pro Lots of third-party resources online
Since it's such a popular library, there's plenty of tutorials, guides, or other third-party resources online.
Pro State is predictable
In Redux, the state of your application is held in a single object. The only way to change the state is to emit an action describing the change — there is no way to mutate state from the view, callbacks, or anywhere else. This makes the state of your application predictable and objective, and reduces the chances of any unintended state mutation by a callback somewhere else in your code.
Pro Can be used with many UI libraries/frameworks
Redux is most commonly used with React, but it can also be used with other UI libraries — Redux is strictly for state management only, thus it is agnostic to your front-end stack.
Pro A lot of widgets
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
Pro Views can be constructed using JavaScript without HTML
The most common way of working with webix is to create a JSON configuration of your view in JavaScript. When you use TypeScript, you get complete typechecking and intellisense in your IDE.
Pro Seems to be quite stable
Even the most complicated GUIs are bug-free most of the time.
Pro Webix Jet
The webix Jet library adds all the required features for SPA development (routing, template loading, ...)
Pro Extremely simple to implement.
To get started is extremely simple. It has a low learning curve.
Pro Mature project
Regular updates and releases.
Pro Great support from the webix team
The company behind webix is really quick in answering any questions you have on their forum or via email.
Pro Awesome responsive material skins
Great design and icons pack.
Cons
Con Codebases can overuse it
Redux is great for state that's required in many disparate parts of the DOM, but frequently you see projects use it to hold all state, instead of just using props. It might be good if more could be done in the official docs to guide developers in when not to use it!
Con Steep learning curve
Redux's pattern can be unintuitive and hard to grasp, especially if you have not worked with functional languages before.
Con Commercial license
It's not free for commercial applications.
Con Not very popular
Not really a reason to not recommend it. But it has still a small user base. It deserves a lot more attention.
Con Not modular
The library is not modular (except for some additional more complex widgets). If you only need a few widgets, you still need to include the entire library.