Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Apple Monaco vs Iosevka, the Slant community recommends Iosevka for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” Iosevka is ranked 6th while Apple Monaco is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Iosevka is:
Iosevka is very clear and legible on all displays and in all sizes.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy on user's eyes
Monaco's rendering is similar to that of Consolas but slightly more playful. Each character seems to be a tiny bit larger when compared to Consolas, yet code takes up the same amount of space.
Pro Good differentiation between clashing characters
The curly braces are easily distinguishable from parentheses, "0" is distinguishable from "O", and "1" is distinguishable from "l", to name but a few.
Pro Beautiful braces, perfect parens
Parentheses are half-circles. Square brackets, half-squares. Curly braces, unmistakable. Geometric, classy, fun, and most importantly clear.
Other fonts' bracket delimiters might start to look lifeless and wilted.
Especially well-suited to those who color their brackets as the colors show even against light backgrounds.
Pro Excellent legibility at non-antialiased small sizes
This font shines for legibility at non-antialiased small sizes. It was originally designed as a 9 pt bitmap font. This is excellent for when maximizing on-screen code is a priority.
Pro Small file size
Even if you are struggling with memory, this font is no concern. Its ttf file is just about 50 kb.
Pro Readable
Iosevka is very clear and legible on all displays and in all sizes.
Pro Narrow
Narrow character width uses horizontal screen space more efficiently.
Pro Large number of weights
This font comes in seven different weights, ranging from thin and extra-light to heavy.
Pro Great customizability
There is full customization of styles and variants in Iosevka.
Pro Support for Cyrillic and Greek letters
Iosevka is quite flexible in that it supports Cyrillic and Greek letters.
Pro Free and open source
Iosevka is free and open source.
Pro Powerline support
Includes characters for supporting Powerline/Airline for terminals and terminal editors.
Pro Ligature characters look great
Few fonts have a good ligation feature. Ligature characters (such as æ or the German ß) are supported in Iosevka and look just as you'd expect them to.
Pro Several styles available
Many of the common styles are available, including Sans Serif and Slab Serif with normal, bold, italic, and bold italic styles.
Pro IPA Support
IPA is a system containing the sounds of spoken language and includes speech qualities such as intonation.
Pro Easy on user's eyes
Due to it being readable on all types of displays, Iosevka isn't hard on the user's eyes.
Pro Well-maintained
The developer is active and responds to user questions and issues.
Pro Good CJK compatibility
Iosevka integrates CJK characters well, those being characters of the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and occasionally Vietnamese languages.
Pro Also variant with tiny serifs available ("Slab")
For better reading longer texts.
Cons
Con Only comes with Mac OS X
While it generally only came with OS X, you can try here for installing on other platforms.
Con Ability to select different anti-aliasing grades was dropped
Before OS X Snow Leopard, it was possible to apply varying degrees of anti-aliasing to the font. At present, the previously "medium" anti-aliasing option is the only choice.
Con Too narrow
Con Must do a custom build to get all ligatures
Con Fewer ligatures than other fonts
Iosevka has a nice ligation set, but it doesn't have as many ligatures as fonts like Hasklig, Monoid, or Pragmata Pro.
