When comparing Sony X900E 55" (XBR55X900E) vs LG UJ6300 55" (55UJ6300), the Slant community recommends Sony X900E 55" (XBR55X900E) for most people. In the question“What are the best TVs?” Sony X900E 55" (XBR55X900E) is ranked 11th while LG UJ6300 55" (55UJ6300) is ranked 174th. The most important reason people chose Sony X900E 55" (XBR55X900E) is:
The Sony X900E is an excellent companion for watching sports because of its admirable image quality, decent motion representation, and good color uniformity. Aided by a highly sensitive panel, the Sony X900E handles its motion blur well as the TV needs only around a 100th of a second for its pixels to switch their color entirely. As a result, moving objects leave just a tiny trail on the screen. The X900E’s pixel response time outperforms every competitor in its price range. The TV can also display beautiful and uniform colors, which allows it to reproduce sports pitches correctly. In fact, the Sony X900E is among the best in its range concerning color uniformity.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent for watching sports
The Sony X900E is an excellent companion for watching sports because of its admirable image quality, decent motion representation, and good color uniformity.
Aided by a highly sensitive panel, the Sony X900E handles its motion blur well as the TV needs only around a 100th of a second for its pixels to switch their color entirely. As a result, moving objects leave just a tiny trail on the screen. The X900E’s pixel response time outperforms every competitor in its price range.
The TV can also display beautiful and uniform colors, which allows it to reproduce sports pitches correctly. In fact, the Sony X900E is among the best in its range concerning color uniformity.
Pro Handles reflections well
The Sony X900E is an excellent option for those who need a TV for a bright room since its panel does an outstanding job of handling reflections thanks to the semi-gloss screen finish, which can diffuse around 98.8% of the incoming light.
Pro Excellent for HDR media
The Sony X900E has everything needed for displaying high-quality HDR content. First, the X900E supports wide color gamut which is essential for a decent HDR experience as it allows the TV to reproduce deep and vibrant colors. Second, in HDR mode, the Sony X900E can sustain up to 525 nits of brightness, which enables it to fight glare and display vivid colors even in bright environments. In its range, the Sony X900E is the most luminous TV.
Pro Excellent for 60p and 24p signals
The Sony X900E is an excellent TV for those who use cable/satellite boxes, DVD/Blu-ray players, and Apple TV because it can detect and eliminate the ‘2:3’ judder effect. This effect is usually caused by 24p content being transmitted using the 60 Hz signal.
Pro Ads-free UI
The main interface of the Sony X900E does not have advertising.
Pro Large app selection
The Sony X900E runs the Android smart TV platform, which has the widest app selection among all current smart TV platforms. All of the applications are available via the Google Play Store.
Pro Compatible with all current-generation consoles
This 4K120 TV is entirely compatible with all of the current generation gaming consoles, including the Xbox One X, PS4 Pro, and Wii U. Additionally, it’s highly unlikely that within the next couple of years any gaming console will break the 120 Hz barrier; so it is expected that this TV will remain compatible even with the next generation consoles.
Pro Suitable for gaming
The Sony X900E is also suitable for gaming because of the TV’s low input lag. While in ‘Game Mode’, the TV’s input lag remains at 34.2 ms allowing for relatively fast-paced gameplay.
Pro Excellent picture quality
The Sony X900E has the best picture quality in its range as the TV manages to balance high contrast ratio, marvelous SDR and HDR brightness, decent color uniformity, acceptable black uniformity, and good color accuracy.
The TV does an outstanding job with dark scenes as its contrast ratio of 5411:1 is perfectly balanced with its decent black uniformity, allowing the X900E to display deep and immersive dark scenes.
As for bright scenes, the TV’s peak luminosity is 509 nits, which is more than enough for making colorful scenes look really luminous, even if the TV is in a bright room.
Pro Good for gaming
The UJ6300 is a decent choice for gaming thanks to its extremely low input lag, excellent response time, and full 4K 60 FPS support.
In terms of input lag, this TV outperforms almost every currently available high-end TV. The low input lag makes the TV great for fast games. The motion blur is really low at ~17ms, so fast-moving objects won't leave any trails at all.
It’s also compatible with 60 Hz 4K input which makes it suitable for high-end console gaming.
Pro Has an excellent smart TV platform
The UJ6300 runs on the webOS smart platform. It has a great ecosystem of apps, ranging from media streaming services (Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, etc.) to third-party apps. Support for these apps are also first-class with up-to-date features and good performance; for instance, the YouTube app supports 360-degree video playback.
Pro Handles reflections well
The UJ6300 does a decent job at lowering the intensity of glare. Reflections are kept to a minimum thanks to the panel's semi-gloss finish. In fact, only around 1.9% of total light is reflected - a feat surpassed only by a handful of higher-end TVs.
Pro Fairly good upscaling capabilities
The UJ6300 can upscale 480p, 720p, and 1080p content quite well. The majority of details will be preserved, although there might be some artifacts on the sides of an image.
Pro Compatible with current-gen consoles
The UJ6300 will run content from the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X smoothly, and its input lag stays low at ~13ms even with HDR-enhanced 4K content. You will not notice any increased delay when switching from SDR gaming mode to HDR.
Pro Good at handling dynamic content
The UJ6300 is great at handling motion, making it a good choice for displaying fast and dynamic content. Fast-moving objects don't leave any discernible trails behind them, thanks to its low motion blur of only ~17ms.
Cons
Con Horrible sound quality
The sound quality of the Sony X900E is a total mismatch to the TV’s excellent picture quality. Additionally, the TV is unable to get really loud as it caps off at 90 dB.
Con Minor image retention problems
If you leave an image on the screen for an extended period, you might notice some minor ghosting effect which will disappear within a couple of minutes. This is a very unusual thing for a VA LED TV.
Con Narrow viewing angle
Like most VA panel TVs, the Sony X900E suffers from massive image degradation due to the viewing angle. The maximum viewing angle of this TV is only 17 degrees.
Con The remote looks outdated
Apart from some tiny details, it seems like LG adapted their old remote from 2016 to the UJ6300. The remote is as basic as it can get. It does not have any smart functions that can be found on higher-tier LG TVs. In fact, it is very disappointing that this TV does not have LG’s new Magic Remote.
Con Suffers from minor image retention
The UJ6300 suffers from minor image retention issues. If a static image is on the screen for more than 10 minutes, it gets burned in and you'll be able to see it retained on the screen faintly, which is really unpleasant. Fortunately, this does not cause permanent pixel damage and disappears in around 5 minutes.
Con Can't handle intense glare
The UJ6300 can’t fight glare well in really bright environments because of the panel’s low peak brightness level. The brightness peaks at only ~170 nits for SDR, which is really low. Even cheaper and lower-tier TVs are usually brighter.
Con Dark scenes look bad
The UJ6300 fails to reproduce deep and uniform blacks. Its dark images look smoky and grey-ish, which makes many dark scenes look awful. Furthermore, the panel’s low contrast ratio of only 1314:1 makes the blacks look distorted and flat.
Con Some artifacts might occur
Because of the TV’s specific RGBW pixel structure, some unwanted artifacts might occur while the TV is displaying 4K content. The problem with the RGBW pixel structure is that only 75% of the total panel's pixels can produce colors, which results in lower quality and less detailed picture.