When comparing Cruise Control vs Assertible - QA for the Web, the Slant community recommends Assertible - QA for the Web for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Assertible - QA for the Web is ranked 21st while Cruise Control is ranked 33rd. The most important reason people chose Assertible - QA for the Web is:
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro .NET version
Cruise Control .NET can be used on Windows to build .NET applications, although it is dated by now, it still can be interesting for use on low-spec systems.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccnet/
Pro Free and open source
Cruise Control is a free and open source project built with Java and hosted on Sourceforge.
Pro Extensive JSON data assertions
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Pro Deployments API to track releases and run tests
The Assertible Deployments API allows you to track releases of your application and automatically initiate post-deploy API tests.
Pro Out-of-the-box support for GitHub deployments
Pro Effortless setup
Cons
Con A bit tricky to set up
CruiseControl may be a bit tricky to set up. However, it has been around for quite a while so it should be pretty easy to find resources to help you out.