When comparing Cruise Control vs Codefresh, the Slant community recommends Codefresh for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Codefresh is ranked 19th while Cruise Control is ranked 33rd. The most important reason people chose Codefresh is:
Once your images, or entire compositions, are ready to be deployed, Codefresh can do it automatically at the end of every build process. Alternatively, you can manually deploy with a single click.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro .NET version
Cruise Control .NET can be used on Windows to build .NET applications, although it is dated by now, it still can be interesting for use on low-spec systems.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccnet/
Pro Free and open source
Cruise Control is a free and open source project built with Java and hosted on Sourceforge.
Pro Easy deployment to any cloud
Once your images, or entire compositions, are ready to be deployed, Codefresh can do it automatically at the end of every build process. Alternatively, you can manually deploy with a single click.
Pro Early Feature Previews
You can share new feature implementations with your team by allowing them to instantly run your Docker image directly from Codefresh.
Pro Super fast builds
Caching build dependencies and docker layers speeds up the application builds.
Cons
Con A bit tricky to set up
CruiseControl may be a bit tricky to set up. However, it has been around for quite a while so it should be pretty easy to find resources to help you out.
