Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Cruise Control vs FinalBuilder, the Slant community recommends FinalBuilder for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” FinalBuilder is ranked 32nd while Cruise Control is ranked 33rd. The most important reason people chose FinalBuilder is:
One of the few websites with useful information about [Code Signing with USB Tokens](https://www.finalbuilder.com/resources/blogs/code-signing-with-usb-tokens).
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro .NET version
Cruise Control .NET can be used on Windows to build .NET applications, although it is dated by now, it still can be interesting for use on low-spec systems.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccnet/
Pro Free and open source
Cruise Control is a free and open source project built with Java and hosted on Sourceforge.
Pro Well documented
One of the few websites with useful information about Code Signing with USB Tokens.
Pro Pre-written scripts available
FinalBuilder has more than 600 pre-written scripts (known as actions) available. These actions help automate common tasks in a build process. This saves a lot of development time because you don't have to write those common tasks yourself.
Cons
Con A bit tricky to set up
CruiseControl may be a bit tricky to set up. However, it has been around for quite a while so it should be pretty easy to find resources to help you out.
Con Not free nor open source
Con Diff on finalbuilder projects are clumsy
Con "Click button" interface
Con Builds are a little unintuitive
The language used in the documentation is a little ambiguous and FinalBuilder feels a little clunky when setting up builds.
