Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Wercker vs FinalBuilder, the Slant community recommends Wercker for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Wercker is ranked 8th while FinalBuilder is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Wercker is:
Wercker is based on Docker and it allows developers to create their own deployment stacks inside Docker containers. These stacks range from programming languages, to services, and even to notifications.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Ability to create and use custom environments
Wercker is based on Docker and it allows developers to create their own deployment stacks inside Docker containers. These stacks range from programming languages, to services, and even to notifications.
Pro Free unlimited number of private repositories CI while in Beta
While in beta, Wercker offers unlimited free public and private repositories.
Pro Social networking elements
Wercker has an activity feed with which different team members can see and follow everything their colleagues have been doing. This gives the tool a certain social network feel, much like GitHub itself.
Pro Well documented
One of the few websites with useful information about Code Signing with USB Tokens.
Pro Pre-written scripts available
FinalBuilder has more than 600 pre-written scripts (known as actions) available. These actions help automate common tasks in a build process. This saves a lot of development time because you don't have to write those common tasks yourself.
Cons
Con Not free nor open source
Con Diff on finalbuilder projects are clumsy
Con "Click button" interface
Con Builds are a little unintuitive
The language used in the documentation is a little ambiguous and FinalBuilder feels a little clunky when setting up builds.
