When comparing Buildkite vs Assertible - QA for the Web, the Slant community recommends Assertible - QA for the Web for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Assertible - QA for the Web is ranked 21st while Buildkite is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Assertible - QA for the Web is:
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Very easy to set up
The web UI allows writing a build script inline, running a script from your repository, or creating a whole pipeline. Docker support is built-in.
Pro Allows parallel jobs
Buildkite allows you to configure your build in order to run parallel jobs and obtain considerably faster results.
Pro Scheduled builds
Run builds on a cron-like schedule to rebuild a master branch or run an import process.
Pro Run your own build servers
Run an agent on your own servers (AWS, etc) so that you have control over what your builds can access.
Pro Intergrates with VCS
Integrates with GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server, GitLab, Codebase, or any custom Git repository.
Pro Affordable
One plan that gives you everything at a reasonable price.
Pro Plugin support for docker and docker-compose
Pro Concurrency control
Make sure only one deploy build runs at a time with concurrency control.
Pro Config driven build process
While you can define your build process in the dashboard, you can also run it from config files in the repository.
Pro Responsive support
Support respond quickly and listen to feedback.
Pro Extensive JSON data assertions
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Pro Deployments API to track releases and run tests
The Assertible Deployments API allows you to track releases of your application and automatically initiate post-deploy API tests.