When comparing Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client vs kitty, the Slant community recommends kitty for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for UNIX-like systems?” kitty is ranked 7th while Shellngn - Cloud Based SSH Client is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose kitty is:
Very elegant keyboard shortcuts for creating and navigating between tiled terminals within each tab with no appreciable lag.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro SSH & SFTP in your browser
Since this tool is cloud-based, there's no need to download and install anything. You can simpy run it from the browser.
Pro RDP/VNC Support
Pro Always up to date
Pro Your devices are available on any device
Pro Tunnel support
Pro RDP/VNC In your browser
Remote desktop your servers from the browser.
Pro Telnet Support
Pro Window tiling
Very elegant keyboard shortcuts for creating and navigating between tiled terminals within each tab with no appreciable lag.
Pro Extensible Kitten framework
Supports plugins to add features one at a time for those who need them. Examples include Unicode input and side-by-side diffs.
Pro Tabs for multiple instances
Operate several terminals from one window using the tabs feature, allowing you to make simultaneous connections to different remote hosts.
Pro Scrollback buffer viewer
Allows for viewing the scrollback buffer in an external pager of your choice ('less' by default, with support for 'more' and 'most'), a huge benefit for turning actions taken in a live terminal session into a script for efficiency or dissemination or collaborating on workflows.
Pro Controlled and configured from the shell prompt within the program itself
No graphical menus to clutter the screen saves system resources and time once you learn that all those options are still available from the command line within the app.
Cons
Con Expensive
$3.90 per month
Con Not free
In fact not only not free, but only available at a subscription basis.
Con Sluggish output
It's ok for a quick session, but compared to native apps it's output is slow.
Con Lack of configurability
Not enough options to trim it to your needs.