When comparing FinalBuilder vs Assertible - QA for the Web, the Slant community recommends Assertible - QA for the Web for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Assertible - QA for the Web is ranked 21st while FinalBuilder is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Assertible - QA for the Web is:
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Well documented
One of the few websites with useful information about Code Signing with USB Tokens.
Pro Pre-written scripts available
FinalBuilder has more than 600 pre-written scripts (known as actions) available. These actions help automate common tasks in a build process. This saves a lot of development time because you don't have to write those common tasks yourself.
Pro Extensive JSON data assertions
There are several built-in assertions for working with JSON data -- like validation, length() functions, JSONPath selectors, and more.
Pro Deployments API to track releases and run tests
The Assertible Deployments API allows you to track releases of your application and automatically initiate post-deploy API tests.
Pro Out-of-the-box support for GitHub deployments
Pro Effortless setup
Cons
Con Not free nor open source
Con Diff on finalbuilder projects are clumsy
Con "Click button" interface
Con Builds are a little unintuitive
The language used in the documentation is a little ambiguous and FinalBuilder feels a little clunky when setting up builds.