Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing FinalBuilder vs Bitbucket Pipelines, the Slant community recommends Bitbucket Pipelines for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Bitbucket Pipelines is ranked 22nd while FinalBuilder is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Bitbucket Pipelines is:
Eg: ./1.setup.sh 48s ./2.build.sh 56s With this information, it's easy to find out which line of the script is the bottleneck of the build process.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Well documented
One of the few websites with useful information about Code Signing with USB Tokens.
Pro Pre-written scripts available
FinalBuilder has more than 600 pre-written scripts (known as actions) available. These actions help automate common tasks in a build process. This saves a lot of development time because you don't have to write those common tasks yourself.
Pro Provides time taken for each step
Eg:
./1.setup.sh 48s
./2.build.sh 56s
With this information, it's easy to find out which line of the script is the bottleneck of the build process.
Pro Great Jira integration
The same company Atlassian built Jira, which provides top-tier integration with Jira.
Pro Combined service: source control and CI
Cons
Con Not free nor open source
Con Diff on finalbuilder projects are clumsy
Con "Click button" interface
Con Builds are a little unintuitive
The language used in the documentation is a little ambiguous and FinalBuilder feels a little clunky when setting up builds.
Con Only 50 mins/month free usage
The Free plan only gives you 50 minutes per month to run the build.
Con Sparse documentation and examples
