Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing FinalBuilder vs Codefresh, the Slant community recommends Codefresh for most people. In the question“What are the best continuous integration tools?” Codefresh is ranked 19th while FinalBuilder is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Codefresh is:
Once your images, or entire compositions, are ready to be deployed, Codefresh can do it automatically at the end of every build process. Alternatively, you can manually deploy with a single click.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Well documented
One of the few websites with useful information about Code Signing with USB Tokens.
Pro Pre-written scripts available
FinalBuilder has more than 600 pre-written scripts (known as actions) available. These actions help automate common tasks in a build process. This saves a lot of development time because you don't have to write those common tasks yourself.
Pro Easy deployment to any cloud
Once your images, or entire compositions, are ready to be deployed, Codefresh can do it automatically at the end of every build process. Alternatively, you can manually deploy with a single click.
Pro Early Feature Previews
You can share new feature implementations with your team by allowing them to instantly run your Docker image directly from Codefresh.
Pro Super fast builds
Caching build dependencies and docker layers speeds up the application builds.
Cons
Con Not free nor open source
Con Diff on finalbuilder projects are clumsy
Con "Click button" interface
Con Builds are a little unintuitive
The language used in the documentation is a little ambiguous and FinalBuilder feels a little clunky when setting up builds.
