Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariQobuz vs Tunesnapper
When comparing Qobuz vs Tunesnapper, the Slant community recommends Qobuz for most people. In the question“What are the best music streaming services?” Qobuz is ranked 4th while Tunesnapper is ranked 33rd. The most important reason people chose Qobuz is:
Music streams at 16 bit, 44.4 khz, Flac, CD Quality. Also, high-res is available.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro High quality streaming
Music streams at 16 bit, 44.4 khz, Flac, CD Quality. Also, high-res is available.
Pro High quality (CD+) streams; subscribers gain access to booklet, when available
Metadata, while better than many, still can't compete with physical media. New to N.A. at the time of this review so there are still some gaps in their catalog.
Pro Easily save music for offline use
You can download MP3's to your mobile device for offline use, this is convenient for those that do not have an internet connection throughout the whole day.
Pro Free to stream music
The service is completely free, meaning you never need to pay in order to stream what is available on the site.
Pro Share playlists over Facebook
Create and share your favorite playlists with your friends on Facebook. This way you can socially display and even discuss what you have been listening to.
Cons
Con Officially available in a limited number of countries
Qobuz is only officially available in 10 countries (which does not include Canada and the US). You can use a VPN in order to pay for the service in an unsupported country. Some users have mentioned success with contacting the country and being added manually (you can read more here).
